« New LRT blog | Main | Lamar Smith Hearts Hugo »

A tale of the edges of two campuses

Sorry for the long break. I've been on business trips to Jebusland for 3 of the last 7 weeks, and had a vacation in the middle, and very busy even when here. Although I'm still busy, I at least have a minute (not enough time to grab any good pictures; since my google-fu was too weak to get something quickly).

I took the family on a short vacation to visit family in State College, home of Penn State (where I went to school and spent the first 9 years of my life - my grandmother still lives in the same neighborhood as the Paternos). On this trip, since my wife is still recovering from Achilles surgery, we didn't spend much time walking through campus as we normally would - we instead spent our time driving around the edges of campus. This was an interesting contrast for me, since I spend quite a bit of time driving around the edge of another major university's campus right here in Austin. Let's compare.

Penn State:

There's a signed and marked bike route which starts on the north end of campus (which is bounded by the old residential neighborhood in which my grandmother lives). This bike route says "Campus and Downtown". It was added shortly before my college years but has been improved since then on each end and consists mainly of off-street paths (sharrows on the street in the neighborhood north of campus, although done poorly). Automobile traffic can still enter the campus from the north in several places, but is then shunted off to the corners - you can no longer go completely through campus from north to south by automobile. Pedestrian accomodations on this side of campus haven't changed for decades - a pleasant cool walk under tons and tons of trees.

On the south side of campus is the downtown area - the area most analogous to The Drag; fronting College Avenue, part of a one-way couplet which carries State Route 26 through the area (other half is two blocks away, called Beaver Avenue). College Avenue has two through lanes of traffic. Shops line the road at a pleasingly short pedestrian-oriented setback, except for a few places (one a church, one a surface parking lot). Pedestrians, counting both sides of the street, get a bit more space than do cars - and cars have to stop almost every block at a traffic light. The speed limit here is 25; you can rarely go that fast. There is plenty of on-street parking. Again, there's places where cars can penetrate campus a bit, but they can't go through campus this direction. Bicycle access from the south comes from a major bike route (with bike lanes that end short of campus) on Garner St. - which then allows bicyclists to continue while motorists have to exit by turning a corner towards the stadium. Two images of the corner of Allen and College from different angles:

College and Allen; shot by ehpien on flickr

From WikiMedia commons

East and west at Penn State aren't as important - the west side fronts US 322 Business (and a major automobile access point was closed; a classroom building now spans the whole old highway!). The east side is primarily for access to sports facilities and the agricultural areas. Ped access from the west is mediocre unless you feel like going through that classroom building, but not very important if you don't since there's not much other reason to be over there. Access from the east is the main future area for improvement - although it's still of a caliber that we would kill for here in Austin; with 2-lane roadways and 30-35 mph speed limits; traffic signals everywhere pedestrians go in reasonable numbers; etc.

Penn State and the town of State College have made it inviting to walk to and through campus, and have made it at pleasant as possible to bike there. Some students still drive, of course, but most cars are warehoused most of the time.

UTier2-West

On UT's west side, Guadalupe is a wide choking monstrosity (4 car lanes with 2 bike lanes - one of which functions pretty well and the other of which was a good attempt that fails in practice due to bad driver behavior). On-street parking exists but is rather difficult to use for its intended purpose; but the merchants will still defend it tooth and nail. Despite having even more students living across this road that need to walk to UT than the analogous group at Penn State, there are fewer pedestrian crossings and they are far less attractive; and there is no bicycle access from the west that indicates any desire at all to promoting this mode of transportation. Although you can't completely get through campus from west to east, you can get a lot farther in than you can at Penn State, and the pedestrian environment suffers for it. The city won't put any more traffic signals on Guadalupe even though there's thousands of pedestrians; and the built environment on Guadalupe is ghastly, with far too much surface parking and far too little in the way of street trees. This shot is about as good as it gets on Guadalupe:

taken by kerri on picasa

On the east side of campus, there's I-35. You'd think this would be much worse than the Guadalupe side for everybody, but at least bicyclists can use Manor Road, which is pretty civilized (better than anything on the west side). Pedestrians are pretty much screwed - noisy, stinky, and hot is no way to walk through life, son.

UT's north side is similarly ghastly. A road clearly designed for high-speed motor vehicle traffic and then gruesomely underposted at 30 mph; way too wide and lots of surface parking. For pedestrians, this edge of campus sucks - for cyclists, it's OK to penetrate, but then UT destroyed through access for cyclists by turning Speedway into UT's underwhelming idea of a pedestrian mall (hint: this is what one really looks like). I could write a whole post on that (and may someday), but the short version is that years ago, UT came to our commission (UTC) with a master plan that crowed about how much they were promoting cycling, yet the only actual change from current conditions was destroying the only good cycling route to and through campus. Yeah, they put up showers and lockers - but that's not going to help if the route TO the showers and lockers is awful enough, and it is. You'll get a lot of cyclists at almost any university just because a lot of students won't have cars and because parking isn't free and plentiful, but if you really want to take it to the next level, I'm pretty confident that eliminating your one good bike route isn't the way to go about it.

Since I went to Penn State (1989-1992), access for pedestrians and bicyclists has actually gradually improved, even though it already was much better than UT, and the campus has become more and more livable. More people walk and bike; fewer people drive; and it's a more enjoyable place than it was before. Since I moved to Austin (1996), the environment for pedestrians and bicyclists travelling to and through UT has actually gotten worse - they're still coasting on the fact that a lot of the area was developed before everybody had a car. Almost every decision they have made since then has been hostile to bicyclists and at least indifferent to pedestrians. As a result, a much larger proportion of students in the area have cars that they use much more often. (Just comparing near-campus-but-off-campus residents here). The recent long-overdue developments in West Campus are a start, but the built environment on the edge of campus has to dramatically change for UT to be anything more than laughable compared to other major college campuses' interfaces with business districts.

Bonus coverage: The area I was staying in in Huntsville, AL is right next to the 'campus' for Alabama-Huntsville. The least said about that, the better - the area in general is like US 183 before the freeway upgrades, except even uglier (if that's possible); and their campus has literally nowhere to walk to - my guess is that every student there has a car, even though the place is clearly not a commuter school.

This entry was posted in the following categories: Austin , Bicycle Commuting , Bicycling in Austin , Personal , Republicans Hate The Environment , Texas Republicans Hate Cities , Transit Field Trips , Urban Design , Walking in Austin (Pedestrian Issues)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://mdahmus.monkeysystems.com/cgi-m1ek/MT/mt-tb.cgi/473

Comments

Nice meaty post. Now you just need to start taking your own pictures. =)

I grew up in Chicago and would often ride north along the lake.

Northwestern University is just north of Chicago, is bounded by Lake Michigan on the east and Sheridan Rd on the west, and is laid out mostly north-south.

Sheridan Rd is the favored road for cyclists in the northern part of the city. The part of it that runs past Northwestern is closed to bike traffic, and I have gotten pulled over by cops for riding there.

Crazy.

Nice post.

Unfortunately, we both know that Austin city government is competely indifferent to improving the pedestrian environment. Don't expect to see changes to West Campus/Guadalupe anytime soon.

I actually wouldn't be quite that hard on our city government - they've done very nice things downtown, and after spending so much time in Huntsville, It Could Be So Much Worse. The key to me is that the city's willing to spend capital money on projects but not willing to make long-term commitments (to take one simple example: like directing city staff to start approving traffic signals based on anticipated rather than current pedestrian counts, which would be a tiny step in the right direction since you never get the 'current' counts high enough without the light there to begin with).

Ok. I overstated things. Great Streets, the Caesar Chavez esplanade, the Pfluger Bridge -- they have done some good stuff around downtown.

But the plan for improving things outside of downtown appears to be, "improve the sidewalks one VMU development at a time." At that rate, I'll be 113 before South Lamar has a decent sidewalk.

The City needs to put more money into infrastructure, especially sidewalks. It's building them, but at an agonizing pace. (One of the worst streets in our neighborhood is like No. 2,000 on their priority list or something.)

Mike, I found this post to be extremely interesting. The Speedway "pedestrian corridor" always shocked me from the moment I entered UT for grad school - why even close off the street if you were going to leave it so ugly? I've read the master plan in full and realize that the long term plan is to close down all the streets (and more power to 'em), but it is just so slooooooooow....

But yes, the Guadalupe and Speedway corridors are both particularly heinous in terms of cyclability/aesthetics. I do think there are a few areas they've made improvements in recent years though - eg the pretty pedestrian corridor near the new art museum.

Also, the Regents have budgeted $12 million for the first phase of Speedway renovations - they're turning it into a genuine pedestrian corridor and I think installing a fountain. Also I think there's supposed to be a dedicated bike lane - at least if they follow the master plan ideas.

Here's the PDF with the budget:

http://www.utsystem.edu/borminutes/2000-Current/8-07Meeting1020.pdf

Budget line item is on page 36. Or just use "find" for Speedway.

On the other hand, they're only doing one phase now - so potentially we're still left with other sections of Speedway (the corner near ACES/Welch/ESB is particularly heinous) remaining hideous. I think the idea is to finish the section near Gregory since they're also building the new Student Activities Center in that parking lot (I rejoice every time they get rid of a interior campus parking lot!!!).

On another note, AC, how do you find the sidewalk priority list?

One more thing: Mike, I'd love to see your extended analysis of biking and Speedway and whatever.

thanks, breathesgelatin, but unfortunately I can't bike anymore (well, not much anyways), so that's an area I have to leave to others.

AC, that sort of problem is precisely why the most important thing I worked on on the UTC was Tommy Eden's requirement that sidewalks be built when streets are reconstructed (as long as total cost doesn't go up more than 20% - my role was just in smoothing the edges so it would pass with the non-radical-cyclists/pedestrians at the time). City council passed it; and it supposedly is in effect for future bond elections.

This eventually allows sidewalk capital projects and federal money to be used for other gaps such as collectors. Your 113 year figure is actually not that far off - a number like that came up at one point as the estimate for how long it would take to get the minimum acceptable sidewalks on all arterials (2 sides) and collectors (1 side) in the city given business-as-usual.

I guy in my neighborhood got their priority list, or at least got them to tell him where our streets ranked. I'll ask him for it.

BTW, I meant to give you one criticism earlier:
Referring to Huntsville as "Jebusland" is not exactly nice. =P

Post a comment