CM reserves down to effectively nothing
Cross-posted from the twitter which is about all I have time for right now:
Was there any doubt? CM was being truthy about reserves/quarter-cent money: Statesman article ( also see: helpful chart ).
This happened, in short, because Capital Metro pursued a cheap rail plan that was so cheap the Feds didn't want any part of it (45M originally promised to voters from Feds now spent out of reserves) - then, a combination of typical overruns and not-so-typical incompetence (and a bit of overruns caused by under-engineering) led to even more spending out of reserves. When they say they have enough money to pay Austin the commitments they made in the past, they are lying. They clearly don't have the money; didn't back then; and Ben Wear deserves some apologies from some Capital Metro employees at this point.
Comments
Before I moved here from Chicago I lived within a 2 minute walk of the "L". 24hr train service (albeit on not very well maintained tracks or trains) to most anywhere I needed to go. When I first heard about MetroRail I was thrilled, a modern, clean and efficient train - everything the "L" isn't. So much so I considered moving near to a planned station. And then I saw the schedule - what a colossal joke. The last train out of Downtown heading north is at 6:45PM - so no drinks/dinner after work. No chance to hit the town and not worry about driving. I expect Austin will be a "car" (and bike) town for a long, long time. MetroRail, if it ever actually starts given the current funding problems, just won't be a solution for many.
Posted by: DrewC
|
April 28, 2009 09:28 AM
Didn't they just defend themselves by saying it was a planned spend down? By extension it appears they may have also planned to spend themselves into bankruptcy. Move along, nothing to see here!
Posted by: Puffy Arizona
|
April 28, 2009 03:03 PM
granted the above f-ups you mention, isn't the biggest problem the 15% drop in sales tax receipts? I imagine that is going to be a problem for more government agencies than just Cap Metro (See COA $30-40 million shortfall).
Of course, if CM had done a better job on the other stuff, they'd be in a better position to weather the tax decrease.
Posted by: Kedron Touvell
|
April 28, 2009 03:42 PM
Yes, the sales tax drop would have killed them either way, but they said just a month or two ago that they had plenty of money to pay Austin for whatever projects we were going to do with that promised 1/4 cent money (not current sales tax revenues; this is stuff from '00 and earlier!).
Just a month or two ago, it was clear that they didn't have the money, but they lied and said they'd have no trouble paying the bill.
Posted by: M1EK
|
April 28, 2009 03:49 PM
Had to go back and expand from home; the hospital wifi was misbehaving.
CM claimed, a month or two back, they would have had no problem repaying Austin the money owed us per the agreements about the 1/4 cent sales tax. Now it's clear they may have to cut operations fairly soon. Where, precisely, was the money going to come from to pay back Austin?
It's clear Wear was right - that the 'capital account' has been spent down to nearly 0 despite owing money to Austin. And if there had been sufficient cushion in the 'operating account' to repay Austin as claimed, they wouldn't be talking about service cuts already.
Posted by: M1EK
|
April 28, 2009 04:33 PM
hmmm...I wonder if this means no Pfluger Bridge overpass this summer.
Posted by: Kedron Touvell
|
April 28, 2009 04:43 PM
Ugh. I'm done with CapMetro. Letting down the city so horridly, lying through their teeth...
Maybe its time to reform Austin's transit situation?
Posted by: northcomm
|
April 28, 2009 08:37 PM