« Updates | Main | New blog to read »

Yes, right-wing know-nothings, bicyclists do pay for the roads

Just sent to the morning show guys at 590-KLBJ, who were discussing the 3-foot passing rule and then let a caller drag the show down into the typical "cyclists don't pay for roads" nonsense. They didn't start there, but also didn't contradict her...

Gentlemen,

Although you probably don't remember, y'all have had me on your show a couple of times for a short talk about transportation. This morning on the way into work, I heard you and your listeners talking about the 3-foot-passing law that Gov. Perry vetoed; and the last caller I listened to made some very inaccurate points which you didn't challenge at all which need to be corrected, regarding paying for roadways.

The fact is that in the state of Texas, the state gas tax is constitutionally dedicated to the state highway system (and schools) - meaning it cannot be spent on any roadway without a route shield (number) on it. For instance, I-35, US 183, RM 2222 - state highways; can get gas tax funding and usually do (with some local contributions thrown into the mix). While the federal gas tax has no such restriction, in practice in our area, the metropolitan planning group that disperses such money spends almost all of it on the state highway system as well.

What does that leave out? Well, essentially 99% of the streets cyclists ride on when they're actually trying to get somewhere. Not just little roads - major roads like Enfield/15th; Cesar Chavez; all the numbered streets downtown; Windsor; Lamar north of the river; Burnet south of 183; etc. - these roads don't get one cent of funding from the gas tax.

What about vehicle registration? Goes exclusively to the state and county governments - and the county doesn't spend any of their money on roads inside city limits.

So cyclists do, in fact, pay for the roads they ride on - in fact, they likely overpay by orders of magnitude considering that their 'bill' for using one of those city-funded streets is the same as if they drove that day, yet they cause a lot more damage and take up a lot more space when they drive (you can fit a lot more cyclists on a street like Speedway than you can cars, in other words).

Please don't let your callers get away with this kind of hurtful know-nothing reactionary attack. While "cyclists don't pay for roads" is a patently false statement, there's plenty of valid disagreement on the 3-foot-passing rule that could have been explored instead, and the listeners deserve that higher-quality discourse.

Regards,
Mike Dahmus
City of Austin Urban Transportation Commission 2000-2005

Looking at this in retrospect, I forgot to even mention that the city pays for its roads with general funds - mostly sales taxes, property taxes, and utility transfers. D'oh. Will email them accordingly. (Still sick with plague and no sleep).

This entry was posted in the following categories: Funding of Transportation , PS: I am not a crackpot

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://mdahmus.monkeysystems.com/cgi-m1ek/MT/mt-tb.cgi/560

Comments

If you really wanna blow these people's minds, petition the state to put a route shield on the Lance Armstrong Bikeway. :)

Hey, why not, they have a route shield on a 10mph road in the Texas State Cemetery...

Post a comment